Democracy, Citizenship and the Radical Possibilities of Postpsychiatry

  • Bracken P
  • Thomas P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Can't yet use as the book not yet published. Not all that much of direct relevance to me. Note p 8 the issue of the power of psychiatry, particularly in coercion-may be worth using. Same page-"postmodern thought does not reject the project of the Enlightenment but argues that we ned to see its downside as well as its positive aspects. It means questioning simple notions of progress and advancement and being aware that science can silence as well as liberate" P 11-[postpsychiatry] deconstructs psychiatry and opens up spaces in which alternative understandings of madness can assume validity denied them by psychiatry. p12-postpsychiatry is not a place, a set of fixed ideas and beliefs. Instead, it is more like a set of orientations whihc together can help us move on from where we are now..... emphasises the importance of contexts. An understanding of soical, political and cultural realities that shape the experiences of those who use the mental health services should be central to our understanding of madness... Events, reactions and social networks are not conceptualised as separate items which can be analysed and measured in isolation, but are instead unerstood as bound together in a web of meaningful connections wihc can be explored and illuminated whilst defying simple causal explanation. See quote by Halpern-check for in book.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bracken, P., & Thomas, P. (2006). Democracy, Citizenship and the Radical Possibilities of Postpsychiatry. In Critical Psychiatry (pp. 149–164). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599192_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free