Fichte y Heidegger: El problemático significado ontológico de la wissenschaftslehre

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

"Fichte and Heidegger: The Problematic Ontological Meaning of the Wissenschaftslehre". The aim of this article is to point out the limitations of an ontological interpretation of Fichte's philosophy. During the period of Jena (1794-1799), Fichte clearly attributes a secondary role to the concept of being. That is to say, Fichte's transcendental philosophy starts by excluding any ontological significance from his own reflection. However, Martin Heidegger's ontological-existential interpretation of Fichte's philosophy has achieved an enormous influence in the recent scholarly literature. Heidegger's interpretation emphasizes excessively the ontological significance of Fichte's philosophy and forgets its practical significance and its corresponding methodological standards.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corsico, L. (2016). Fichte y Heidegger: El problemático significado ontológico de la wissenschaftslehre. Arete, 28(1), 31–60. https://doi.org/10.18800/arete.201601.002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free