Rejecting, reframing, and reintroducing: trans people's strategic engagement with the medicalisation of gender dysphoria

75Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article uses ethnographic methods to explore how transgender people engage the medicalisation of transgender experience in a U.S. context under the purview of the American Psychiatric Association. Building on sociological literature related to medicalisation, this paper argues that the lived experience of medicalisation is a non-linear, complex process whereby individual engagement with medical authority is both empowering and constraining in the lives of trans people. Inductive qualitative analysis of 158 hours of participant observation and 33 in-depth interviews with members of a transgender community organisation revealed that transgender individuals (i) reject a medical frame for gender dysphoria, (ii) embrace and stress the importance of gender-affirming medical technologies for individual identity development and social interaction and (iii) strategically reintroduce medical logics and embrace medical authority in order to facilitate medical and social recognition, validation and acceptance.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, A. H. (2019). Rejecting, reframing, and reintroducing: trans people’s strategic engagement with the medicalisation of gender dysphoria. Sociology of Health and Illness, 41(3), 517–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12829

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free