Quality and Experience of Outpatient Care in the United States for Adults with or Without Primary Care

69Citations
Citations of this article
131Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Importance: The US health care system is typically organized around hospitals and specialty care. The value of primary care remains unclear and debated. Objective: To determine whether an association exists between receipt of primary care and high-value services, low-value services, and patient experience. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a nationally representative analysis of noninstitutionalized US adults 18 years or older who participated in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Propensity score-weighted quality and experience of care were compared between 49286 US adults with and 21133 adults without primary care from 2012 to 2014. Temporal trends were also analyzed from 2002 to 2014. Exposures: Patient-reported receipt of primary care, determined by the 4 "Cs" of primary care: first-contact care that is comprehensive, continuous, and coordinated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-nine clinical quality measures and 7 patient experience measures aggregated into 10 clinical quality composites (6 high-value and 4 low-value services), an overall patient experience rating, and 2 experience composites. Results: From 2002 to 2014, the mean annual survey response rate was 58% (range, 49%-65%). Between 2012 and 2014, compared with respondents without primary care (before adjustment), those with primary care were older (50 [95% CI, 50-51] vs 38 [95% CI, 38-39] years old), more often female (55% [95% CI, 54%-55%] vs 42% [95% CI, 41%-43%]), and predominately white individuals (50% [95% CI, 49%-52%] vs 43% [95% CI, 41%-45%]). After propensity score weighting, US adults with or without primary care had the same mean numbers of outpatient (6.7 vs 5.9; difference, 0.8 [95% CI, -0.2 to 1.8]; P =.11), emergency department (0.2 for both; difference, 0.0 [95% CI, -0.1 to 0.0]; P =.17), and inpatient (0.1 for both; difference, 0.0 [95% CI, 0.0-0.0]; P =.92) encounters annually, but those with primary care filled more prescriptions (mean, 14.1 vs 10.7; difference, 3.4 [95% CI, 2.0-4.7]; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levine, D. M., Landon, B. E., & Linder, J. A. (2019). Quality and Experience of Outpatient Care in the United States for Adults with or Without Primary Care. JAMA Internal Medicine, 179(3), 363–372. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6716

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free