Clinical Accuracy of Non-Contact Forehead Infrared Thermometer Measurement in Children: An Observational Study

7Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We evaluated the clinical reliability and utility of temperature measurements using no-contact forehead infrared thermometers (NCFITs) by comparing their temperature measurements with those obtained using infrared tympanic thermometers (IRTTs) in children. In this observational, prospective, and cross-sectional study, we enrolled 255 children (aged 1 month to 18 years) from the pediatric surgery ward at a tertiary medical center in Korea. The mean age of the children was 9.05 ± 5.39 years, and 54.9% were boys. The incidence rate of fever, defined as an IRTT reading of ≥38.0 °C, was 15.7%. The ICC coefficient for the assessment of agreement between temperatures recorded by the NCFIT and IRTT was 0.87, and the κ-coefficient was 0.83. The bias and 95% limits of agreement were 0.15 °C (−0.43 to 0.73). For an accurate diagnosis of fever (≥38 °C), the false-negative rate was much lower, but the false-positive rate was higher, especially in 6-year-old children. Therefore, NCFITs can be used to screen children for fever. However, a secondary check is required using another thermometer when the child’s temperature is >38 °C. NCFITs are proposed for screening but not for measuring the temperature. For the latter, an accurate and reliable thermometer shall be used.

References Powered by Scopus

A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research

18245Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice

1127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparison of ear-based, bladder, oral, and axillary methods for core temperature measurement

173Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Non-Contact Infrared Thermometers and Thermal Scanners for Human Body Temperature Monitoring: A Systematic Review

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of age on comparative diagnostic accuracy of temporal artery thermometers and non-contact infrared thermometers for fever detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessment of the accuracy and reliability of clinical thermometers for body temperature measurements at the hospital: a laboratory study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, Y. M., Jang, M. R., Moon, J. R., Park, G., An, Y. J., & Seo, J. M. (2022). Clinical Accuracy of Non-Contact Forehead Infrared Thermometer Measurement in Children: An Observational Study. Children, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/children9091389

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

40%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Physics and Astronomy 1

20%

Arts and Humanities 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free