Integrating research into clinical internship training Bridging the science/practice gap in pediatric psychology

9Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Existing literature highlights a critical gap between science and practice in clinical psychology. The internship year is a "capstone experience"; training in Methods of scientific evaluation should be integrated with the development of advanced clinical competencies. We provide a rationale for continued exposure to research during the clinical internship year, including, (a) critical examination and integration of the literature regarding evidence-based treatment and assessment, (b) participation in faculty-based and independent research, and (c) orientation to the science and strategy of grantsmanship. Participation in research provides exposure to new empirical models and can foster the development of applied research questions. Orientation to grantsmanship can yield an initial sense of the "business of science." Internship provides an important opportunity to examine the challenges to integrating the clinical evidence base into professional practice; for that reason, providing research exposure on internship is an important strategy in training the next generation of pediatric psychologists. © 2011 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McQuaid, E. L., & Spirito, A. (2012). Integrating research into clinical internship training Bridging the science/practice gap in pediatric psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 37(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsr114

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free