Multi-objective bayesian optimization for engineering simulation

5Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rather than optimizing expensive objective functions such as complex engineering simulations directly, Bayesian optimization methodologies fit a surrogate model (typically Kriging or a Gaussian Process) on evaluations of the objective function(s). To determine the next evaluation, an acquisition function is optimized (also referred to as infill criterion or sampling policy) which incorporates the model prediction and uncertainty and balances exploration and exploitation. Therefore, Bayesian optimization methodologies replace a single optimization of the objective function by a sequence of optimization problems: this makes sense as the acquisition function is cheap-to-evaluate whereas the objective is not. Depending on the goal different acquisition functions are available: multi-objective acquisition functions are relatively new and this chapter gives a state-of-the-art overview and illustrates some approaches based on hypervolume improvement. It is shown that the quality of the model is crucial for the performance of Bayesian optimization and illustrate this by using the more flexible Student-t processes as surrogate models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van der Herten, J., Knudde, N., Couckuyt, I., & Dhaene, T. (2020). Multi-objective bayesian optimization for engineering simulation. In Studies in Computational Intelligence (Vol. 833, pp. 47–68). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18764-4_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free