Experimental aesthetics: Children’s complexity preference in original art and photoreproductions

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The relationship between aesthetic preference and complexity was studied in children, comparing full-size original abstract artworks with reduced-size photoreproductions. No preference for complexity was found; rather, a tendency toward preference for intermediate levels of complexity, or rejection of high complexity, seemed to be indicated, primarily for the full-size original artworks. There was little relationship between results with the original artworks and their reduced-size photoreproductions, suggesting, until further research can be accomplished, a cautionary note in the widespread use of photoreproductions in experimental aesthetics. © 1980, The Psychonomic Society, Inc.. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

The relationship between aesthetic preference and visual complexity in absract art

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Age and uncertainty: Developmental variation in preference for variability

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meaningfulness in visual complexity

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Liking versus complexity: Decomposing the inverted U-curve

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Examining Complexity across Domains: Relating Subjective and Objective Measures of Affective Environmental Scenes, Paintings and Music

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Implicit Analysis of Perceptual Multimedia Experience Based on Physiological Response: A Review

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farley, F. H., & Weinstock, C. A. (1980). Experimental aesthetics: Children’s complexity preference in original art and photoreproductions. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15(3), 194–196. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334506

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Researcher 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 3

43%

Arts and Humanities 2

29%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

14%

Materials Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free