Comments on the “the main contribution of the Ricardian trade theory” by Ronald W. Jones

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is a critical assessment of the Ricardian model and its usefulness in research. It starts with explaining the analytical difficulties by which the two-by-two model is characterized in comparison to an endowment model. Further, it is examined why it is challenging to add further dimensions and extend the basic example to a three-by-three case. Three possible solutions of the challenges related to many-good and many-country cases are discussed. Firstly, understand the possible efficient outcomes of these cases based on Jones (The Review of Economic Studies 28(3):161-175, 1961). Secondly, introduce the many-good-continuum model of Dornbusch, Fischer and Samuelson (The American Economic Review 67(5):823-839, 1977). Thirdly, find an empirical approach such as Eaton and Kortum (Econometrica 70(5):1741-1779, 2002).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scott Taylor, M. (2017). Comments on the “the main contribution of the Ricardian trade theory” by Ronald W. Jones. In 200 Years of Ricardian Trade Theory: Challenges of Globalization (pp. 117–127). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60606-4_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free