Atypical Employment and Flexicurity

  • Keller B
  • Seifert H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hitherto, discussion of flexicurity has focused on normal employment (Normalarbeitsverhältnis), with atypical work receiving only cursory attention. This paper attempts to remedy this conceptual oversight by identifying strategies for reducing the social risks. We begin by analysing the two components that make up flexicurity. Therefore, we draw on the conceptual framework of forms of flexibilization. As far as social security is concerned, we propose a set of criteria that take into account short-term and long-term effects. We then describe the different forms of atypical work and their development since the 1980s. It is necessary to establish which individuals are particularly affected. Then we discuss the extent to which the individual forms are not just atypical but also precarious. Finally, we offer further reflections on the concept of flexicurity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keller, B., & Seifert, H. (2005). Atypical Employment and Flexicurity. Management Revu, 16(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.5771/0935-9915-2005-3-304

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free