Choice of electrocardiographic leads for recording the earliest QRS onset in noninvasive measurements

10Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A significant error may be introduced in intervals measured from the onset of the QRS if an electrocardiographic lead that does not record the earliest deflection is used. To ascertain to what extent the commonly used leads can be relied on to show the earliest QRS onset, 100 normal subjects and 219 patients with heart disease were studied by means of simultaneous recording of three leads: a right precordial lead chosed to show an rS configuration, lead II, and another limb lead chosen to show qR configuration. Lead II most frequently showed a delayed QRS onset - in 34% of normal subjects and 36% of the patients. In the other limb lead the initial QRS deflection was delayed in 24% of the normal subjects and 23% of the patients. The QRS onset in the right precordial lead was never delayed in the normal subjects; however, it was delayed in this lead in 6% of the patients. The delays in each of the leads ranged from 5-20 msec. We conclude that while a right precordial lead is by far the most reliable single lead that can be used for interval measurements, simultaneous recording of a right precordial lead and a limb lead assures the recording of the earliest QRS onset in all cases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wanderman, K. L., Loutaty, G., Ovsyshcher, I., Cantor, A., Gussarsky, Y., & Gueron, M. (1981). Choice of electrocardiographic leads for recording the earliest QRS onset in noninvasive measurements. Circulation, 63(4), 933–937. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.63.4.933

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free