Why it's worth the hassle: The value of in-situ studies when designing ubicomp

139Citations
Citations of this article
197Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How should Ubicomp technologies be evaluated? While lab studies are good at sensing aspects of human behavior and revealing usability problems, they are poor at capturing context of use. In-situ studies are good at demonstrating how people appropriate technologies in their intended setting, but are expensive and difficult to conduct. Here, we show how they can be used more productively in the design process. A mobile learning device was developed to support teams of students carrying out scientific inquiry in the field. An initial in-situ study showed it was not used in the way envisioned. A contextualized analysis led to a comprehensive understanding of the user experience, usability and context of use, leading to a substantial redesign. A second in-situ study showed a big improvement in device usability and collaborative learning. We discuss the findings and conclude how in-situ studies can play an important role in the design and evaluation of Ubicomp applications and user experiences. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rogers, Y., Connelly, K., Tedesco, L., Hazlewood, W., Kurtz, A., Hall, R. E., … Toscos, T. (2007). Why it’s worth the hassle: The value of in-situ studies when designing ubicomp. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4717 LNCS, pp. 336–353). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free