Although state-of-the-art CAD systems for breast imaging have a high sensitivity, their practical applicability is limited by the large number of false positive detections. Recently different multiple view strategies were proposed to increase the specificity. So far it was not possible to compare the performance of these methods, because different validation procedures were used. In this paper we validate all multiple view strategies using the same database and CAD system to make a performance comparison possible. Our results show that the performance difference between different multiple view strategies is small. Asymmetry (difference between left and right breast) and the corresponding view (e.g. if we examine the CC view we use additional information from the MLO view) yields equal performance. The performance is slightly worse using a breast atlas. Multiple view features are weaker than single view features (e.g. CAD score), but it is advantageous that multiple view features provide complementary information. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
CITATION STYLE
Teubl, J., & Bischof, H. (2008). Comparison of multiple view strategies to reduce false positives in breast imaging. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5116 LNCS, pp. 537–544). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_75
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.