Closing a mental account: the realization effect for gains and losses

10Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

How do risk attitudes change after experiencing gains or losses? For the case of losses, Imas (Am Econ Rev 106:2086–2109, 2016) shows that subsequent risk-taking behavior depends on whether these losses have been realized or not. After a realized loss, individuals’ risk-taking decreases, whereas it increases after an unrealized (paper) loss. He refers to this asymmetry as the realization effect. In this study, we derive theoretical predictions for risk-taking after paper and realized gains, and for investment opportunities with different skewness. We experimentally test these predictions and, at the same time, replicate Imas’ original study. Independent of a prior gain or loss, we show that subsequent risk-taking is higher when outcomes remain unrealized. However, we find no evidence of a realization effect for non-positively skewed lotteries. While the first result suggests that the effect is more general, the second result reveals its boundary conditions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Merkle, C., Müller-Dethard, J., & Weber, M. (2021). Closing a mental account: the realization effect for gains and losses. Experimental Economics, 24(1), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09663-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free