Structure and function of Zooplankton-associated bacterial communities in a temperate estuary change more with time than with Zooplankton species

12Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Zooplankton support distinct bacterial communities in high concentrations relative to the surrounding water, but little is known about how the compositions and functionalities of these bacterial communities change through time in relation to environmental conditions. We conducted a year-long field study of bacterial communities associated with common zooplankton groups as well as free-living bacterial communities in the York River, a tributary of Chesapeake Bay. Bacterial community genetic fingerprints and their carbon substrate usage were examined by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of amplified 16S rDNA and by Biolog EcoPlates, respectively. Zooplankton-associated communities were genetically distinct from free-living bacterial communities but utilized a similar array of carbon substrates. On average, bacteria associated with different zooplankton groups were genetically more similar to each other within each month (65.4% similarity) than to bacterial communities of the same zooplankton group from different months (28 to 30% similarity), which suggests the importance of ambient environmental conditions in shaping resident zooplankton-associated bacterial communities. Monthly changes in carbon substrate utilization were less variable for zooplankton-associated bacteria than for free-living bacteria, suggesting that the zooplankton microhabitat is more stable than the surrounding water and supports specific bacterial groups in the otherwise unfavorable conditions in the water column. © Inter-Research 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bickel, S. L., Tang, K. W., & Grossart, H. P. (2014). Structure and function of Zooplankton-associated bacterial communities in a temperate estuary change more with time than with Zooplankton species. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 72(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01676

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free