Democracy and Norms of War: Locating Moral Responsibility for Atrocity in Iraq

  • Crawford N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Several US military personnel have been accused of committing "atrocities" in Iraq. The dominant assumption is that these were isolated incidents. Further, it is commonly assumed that if these incidents were atrocities, or war crimes, the individuals who perpetrated them, and in some cases their commanders, should be held both legally and morally responsible. Yet the paradigm of individual responsibility does not capture all that is morally meaningful about these incidents. When policies regularly and predictably cause them, even though unintended, atrocity can become systemic. The concept of collective moral responsibility - at the organization, state, and public levels - helps us understand how these acts could occur and what they mean. Systemic atrocity and collective moral responsibility are two useful concepts to look for means to prevent atrocities and to respond to them. © De Boeck Université.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crawford, N. C. (2008). Democracy and Norms of War: Locating Moral Responsibility for Atrocity in Iraq. In Democracies at War against Terrorism (pp. 103–127). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230614727_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free