Surgical and prosthetic outcomes of 967 implants under immediate or delayed loading in full-arch rehabilitation: A retrospective study with up to 5 years of follow-up

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate implant and prosthesis survival rates in full-arch rehabilitation supported by implants with platform-switched Morse taper connection submitted to immediate or delayed loading, after up to 5 years of follow-up. Material and Methods: Data was retrospectively collected from clinical records of patients who were treated by means of implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation. Survival rates of implants and prostheses were evaluated according to immediate or delayed loading. Results: The sample comprised 967 implants. Of those, 627 were submitted to immediate loading (IL) while 340 to delayed loading (DL). After a follow-up period of up to 5 years, the implant survival rate for IL was of 99.7% (622/627 implants) and 97.2% (333/340 implants) for DL. The overall implant survival rate was 98.8% (955/967 implants). Prosthesis survival rate was 100% (N = 178) for both groups. Significantly more implants in the DL group presented bone loss (p > 0.01), either greater or lower than 2 mm, during the follow-up period. Conclusion: Within their limits, the present results suggest that full-arch rehabilitation with platform-switched Morse taper connection implants can lead to surgical and prosthetic predictable outcomes. Moreover, immediate loading protocol seems to be a good option for the rehabilitation of fully edentulous patients, as it involves a shorter treatment time, which may lead to greater patient satisfaction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomé, G., Caldas, W., Vianna, C. P., Cartelli, C. A., & Trojan, L. C. (2021). Surgical and prosthetic outcomes of 967 implants under immediate or delayed loading in full-arch rehabilitation: A retrospective study with up to 5 years of follow-up. Brazilian Dental Science, 24(3), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.14295/bds.2021.v24i3.2403

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free