Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020

  • Abrianto B
  • Nugraha X
  • Hartono J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This doctrinal research aims to analyze the development of legal consequences and legal protection related to the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials. Until the enactment of the Job Creation Act, there were 3 (three) different legal norms regarding the legal consequences of the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials, namely fictitious rejection, in the State Administrative Court Law, fictitious approval followed up with applications, in the Government Administration Act, and fictitious approval without being followed up with an application, in the Job Creation Act. Based on the principle that the new law overrides the old law, the applicable legal consequences are as regulated in the Job Creation Act. Then, legal protection related to the Government's omission on applications to state administrative officials are the imposition of administrative sanctions, submitting applications for the determination of fictitious approval of state administrative decisions to the Administrative Court, filing claims based on government actions disputes, or submitting reports to the Ombudsman.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abrianto, B. O., Nugraha, X., Hartono, J., & Kosuma, I. P. (2023). Problematika Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Bersifat Fiktif Positif Setelah Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020. Arena Hukum, 16(3), 532–556. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01603.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free