Using INC Within Divide-and-Conquer Phylogeny Estimation

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In a recent paper (Zhang, Rao, and Warnow, Algorithms for Molecular Biology 2019), the INC (incremental tree building) algorithm was presented and proven to be absolute fast converging under standard sequence evolution models. A variant of INC which allows a set of disjoint constraint trees to be provided and then uses INC to merge the constraint trees was also presented (i.e., Constrained INC). We report on a study evaluating INC on a range of simulated datasets, and show that it has very poor accuracy in comparison to standard methods. We also explore the design space for divide-and-conquer strategies for phylogeny estimation that use Constrained INC, and show modifications that provide improved accuracy. In particular, we present INC-ML, a divide-and-conquer approach to maximum likelihood (ML) estimation that comes close to the leading ML heuristics in terms of accuracy, and is more accurate than the current best distance-based methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Le, T., Sy, A., Molloy, E. K., Zhang, Q. (Richard), Rao, S., & Warnow, T. (2019). Using INC Within Divide-and-Conquer Phylogeny Estimation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 11488 LNBI, pp. 167–178). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18174-1_12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free