Enhancing capacity to make sexuality-related decisions in people with an intellectual disability

112Citations
Citations of this article
169Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to apply an intervention to the area of sexual knowledge in order to determine if capacity to make sexuality-related decisions could be improved. Method: The study adopted a single subject design using multiple baseline method with four adults with a moderate intellectual disability. The intervention consisted of individually tailored sex education adapted from Living Your Life (Bustard 2003). Treatment was offered to each participant twice weekly for a 10-week period on a one-to-one basis. The Sexual Consent and Education Assessment (SCEA, Kennedy 1993) was used for measurement purposes. The SCEA K-Scale (knowledge) and the S-Scale (safety practices) were administered weekly throughout the baseline, treatment and post-treatment phases of the study. Staff concerns were also assessed using the SCEA Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour Scale. Results: All four participants improved their decision-making capacity in all targeted areas as measured by improvements in K-Scale and S-Scale scores. Staff concerns were not increased as indicated by results on the Inappropriate Sexual Behaviour Scale. Six-month follow-up data for three of the participants showed maintenance of scores on the S-Scale and some decay in scores on the K-Scale from post-intervention performance. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that tailored sexuality education can improve capacity to make sexuality-related decisions. © Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dukes, E., & Mcguire, B. E. (2009). Enhancing capacity to make sexuality-related decisions in people with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(8), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01186.x

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 78

76%

Researcher 12

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 49

44%

Psychology 31

28%

Medicine and Dentistry 19

17%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0