Transgender Athletes and Principles of Sport Categorization: Why Genealogy and the Gendered Body Will Not Help

15Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper offers a discussion of the rationale for the creation of sports categorization criteria based on sporting genealogy and the gendered body, as proposed by Torres et al. in their article ‘Beyond Physiology: Embodied Experience, Embodied Advantage, and the Inclusion of Transgender Athletes in Competitive Sport’. The strength of their ‘phenomenological’ account lies in its complex account of human experience; but this is also what makes it impractical and difficult to operationalize. Categorization rather requires simplicity and practicability, if it is to be applied to all athletes (and not exceptionally to transgender athletes). This discussion helps us to formulate three general principles for the process of categorization of athletes, relating to fairness, verifiability and practicability.

References Powered by Scopus

Transgender Women in the Female Category of Sport: Perspectives on Testosterone Suppression and Performance Advantage

122Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Beyond fairness: the ethics of inclusion for transgender and intersex athletes

75Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Transgender women in sport

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Sex and gender in sport categorization: aiming for terminological clarity

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patriarchy in Disguise: Burke on Pike and World Rugby

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inclusion as the value of eligibility rules in sport

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martínková, I., Parry, J., & Imbrišević, M. (2023). Transgender Athletes and Principles of Sport Categorization: Why Genealogy and the Gendered Body Will Not Help. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 17(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2021.1974530

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

36%

Sports and Recreations 4

29%

Psychology 4

29%

Philosophy 1

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 108

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free