Background: Flow cytometry has been used to detect anti-red blood cell (RBC) antibodies in dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA), but the prevalence of anti-RBC antibodies in anemic and nonanemic dogs with a variety of different diseases has not been assessed previously. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that anti-RBC antibodies would be more common in anemic dogs and in dogs with immune-mediated disorders and cancer. Animals: Blood samples from 292 dogs were analyzed prospectively by flow cytometry for anti-RBC antibodies. Methods: Blood samples from 147 anemic and 145 nonanemic dogs were evaluated by flow cytometry to detect surface-bound immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM antibodies on RBC. Disease associations with RBC antibodies were determined, as was the correlation between disease status and the percentage of Ig+ RBC. The specificity and sensitivity of flow cytometry and clinical variables for the diagnosis of IMHA were compared by Bayesian analysis. Results: Anemic dogs were significantly more likely to be positive for anti-RBC antibodies (IgG, IgM, or both) than nonanemic dogs. Anemic dogs also had significantly higher percentages of Ig+ RBC than nonanemic dogs, whereas dogs with IMHA had significantly higher percentages of Ig+ RBC than dogs with all other diseases. Dogs with IMHA, infectious diseases, and immune-mediated thrombocytopenia were significantly more likely to have anti-RBC antibodies than dogs with other medical or surgical diseases. Conclusions: Anemic dogs with immune-mediated diseases and infectious diseases were at the highest risk for the development of anti-RBC antibodies, and flow cytometry for the detection of IgG on RBC was highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of IMHA. Copyright © 2008 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Morley, P., Mathes, M., Guth, A., & Dow, S. (2008). Anti-erythrocyte antibodies and disease associations in anemic and nonanemic dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 22(4), 886–892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0112.x