Efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life of treatments for acute relapses of multiple sclerosis: results from a literature review of randomized controlled trials

  • Costello J
  • Njue A
  • Lyall M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP), repository corticotropin injection (RCI), plasmapheresis (PMP), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used in the treatment of acute multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. A systematic literature review (SLR) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted to examine the highest quality evidence available for these therapies. Methods: English-language articles were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library through May 2016 per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards. MS conferences, SLRs, and bibliographies of included studies were also searched. Eligible studies included adults treated with ≥1 aforementioned therapy. Results: Twenty-three RCTs were identified: 22 on efficacy, 11 on safety, and 3 on QOL (ie 18 IVMP, 2 RCI, 2 PMP, and 2 IVIG). IVMP and RCI improved relapse-related disability; however, IVIG and PMP showed inconsistent efficacy. QOL data were only ascertained for IVMP. Conclusions: RCTs indicate IVMP and RCI are efficacious and well tolerated treatments for MS relapse. Overall, many RCTs were dated, with sample sizes of fewer than 30 patients and no definitions for relapse nor clinically significant change. Contemporary evidence generation for all relapse treatments of interest, across efficacy, safety, and QOL outcomes, is still needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Costello, J., Njue, A., Lyall, M., Heyes, A., Mahler, N., Philbin, M., & Nazareth, T. (2019). Efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life of treatments for acute relapses of multiple sclerosis: results from a literature review of randomized controlled trials. Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, Volume 9, 55–78. https://doi.org/10.2147/dnnd.s208815

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free