Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with progressive brain metastases

59Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the present study we have evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of repeated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with recurrent/progressive brain metastases. Between March 2006 and October 2014, 43 patients (21 men and 22 women) with 47 lesions received a second course of SRS given in three daily fractions of 7–8 Gy. With a follow-up study of 19 months, the 1- and 2-year survival rates from repeated SRS were 37 and 20 %, respectively, and the 1- and 2-year local control rates were 70 and 60 %, respectively. Actuarial local control was significantly better for breast and lung metastases as compared with melanoma metastases; specifically, 1-year local control rates were 38 % for melanoma, 78 % for breast carcinoma and 73 % for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) metastases (p = 0.01). The cause of death was progressive systemic disease in 25 patients and progressive brain disease in 11 patients. Stable extracranial disease (p = 0.01) and Karnofsky performance status (KPS; p = 0.03) were predictive of longer survival. Radiologic changes suggestive of brain radionecrosis were observed in 9 (19 %) out of 47 lesions, with an actuarial risk of 34 % at 12 months. Neurological deficits (RTOG Grade 2 or 3) associated with brain necrosis occurred in 14 % of patients. In conclusion, a second course of SRS given in three daily fractions is a feasible treatment for selected patients with recurrent/progressive brain metastases. Further studies are needed to explore the efficacy and safety of different dose-fractionation schedules, especially in patients with melanoma or large metastases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Minniti, G., Scaringi, C., Paolini, S., Clarke, E., Cicone, F., Esposito, V., … Enrici, R. M. (2016). Repeated stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with progressive brain metastases. Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 126(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-015-1937-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free