Despite the recent academic efforts to develop Electronic Design Automation (EDA) algorithms for 3D ICs, the current market does not have commercial 3D computer-aided design (CAD) tools. Instead pseudo-3D alternative design flows have been devised which utilize commercial 2D CAD engines with tricks that help them operate as a fairly-eficient 3D CAD tool. In this paper we provide detailed discussions and fair power-performance-area (PPA) comparisons of state-of-the-art pseudo-3D design flows. We also analyze the limitations of each design flow and provide solutions with better PPA and various design options. Our experiments using commercial PDK, GDS layouts, and sign-off simulations demonstrate that we achieve up to 26% wirelength and 10% power consumption reduction for pseudo-3D design flows. We also provide a partitioning-first scheme to partitioning-last design flow which increases design freedom with tolerable PPA degradation.
CITATION STYLE
Park, H., Ku, B. W., Chang, K., Shim, D. E., & Lim, S. K. (2020). Pseudo-3D approaches for commercial-grade RTL-to-GDS tool flow targeting monolithic 3D ICs. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Physical Design (pp. 47–54). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372780.3375567
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.