The DSM-5's Proposed New Categories of Sexual Disorder: The Problem of False Positives in Sexual Diagnosis

37Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The proposals that have emerged from the DSM-5 revision process have triggered considerable controversy, especially regarding potential invalid inflation of diagnostic categories. To illustrate the kinds of issues that have emerged, I closely examine the proposed new categories of sexual disorder. The DSM-5 Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders Work Group is proposing the addition of three categories of disorder to the DSM-5-hypersexuality, hebephilia (as part of a revised pedophilia category that would become pedohebephilia), and coercive paraphilic disorder (basically a "nonconsent" or rape paraphilia). These proposals are driven by perceived clinical or forensic needs. I argue, however, that their conceptual soundness remains problematic; each could lead to large numbers of false positive diagnoses (i. e., diagnoses that mistakenly label a normal variant of behavior as a mental disorder), with potential for serious forensic abuse in "sexually violent predator" civil commitment proceedings. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wakefield, J. C. (2012). The DSM-5’s Proposed New Categories of Sexual Disorder: The Problem of False Positives in Sexual Diagnosis. Clinical Social Work Journal, 40(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-011-0353-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free