Effect of two additional interventions, test and reflection, added to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on seventh grade students' practical skills and willingness to act: A cluster randomised trial

15Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this research is to investigate if two additional interventions, test and reflection, after standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training facilitate learning by comparing 13-year-old students' practical skills and willingness to act. Settings Seventh grade students in council schools of two municipalities in south-east Sweden. Design School classes were randomised to CPR training only (O), CPR training with a practical test including feedback (T) or CPR training with reflection and a practical test including feedback (RT). Measures of practical skills and willingness to act in a potential life-threatening situation were studied directly after training and at 6 months using a digital reporting system and a survey. A modified Cardiff test was used to register the practical skills, where scores in each of 12 items resulted in a total score of 12-48 points. The study was conducted in accordance with current European Resuscitation Council guidelines during December 2013 to October 2014. Participants 29 classes for a total of 587 seventh grade students were included in the study. Primary and secondary outcome measures The total score of the modified Cardiff test at 6 months was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the total score directly after training, the 12 individual items of the modified Cardiff test and willingness to act. Results At 6 months, the T and O groups scored 32 (3.9) and 30 (4.0) points, respectively (p<0.001), while the RT group scored 32 (4.2) points (not significant when compared with T). There were no significant differences in willingness to act between the groups after 6 months. Conclusions A practical test including feedback directly after training improved the students' acquisition of practical CPR skills. Reflection did not increase further CPR skills. At 6-month follow-up, no intervention effect was found regarding willingness to make a life-saving effort.

References Powered by Scopus

Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective

8784Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The power of feedback

7613Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement

5977Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

KIDS SAVE LIVES: Basic Life Support Education for Schoolchildren: A Narrative Review and Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Self-learning training versus instructor-led training for basic life support: A cluster randomised trial

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

KIDS SAVE LIVES: Basic Life Support Education for Schoolchildren: A Narrative Review and Scientific Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nord, A., Hult, H., Kreitz-Sandberg, S., Herlitz, J., Svensson, L., & Nilsson, L. (2017). Effect of two additional interventions, test and reflection, added to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on seventh grade students’ practical skills and willingness to act: A cluster randomised trial. BMJ Open, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014230

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

59%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

18%

Researcher 5

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 17

43%

Medicine and Dentistry 17

43%

Social Sciences 4

10%

Sports and Recreations 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free