Measurement of the affinity of anti-D in the serum of immunized mothers and in immunoglobulin preparations with unlabeled antibodies

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on the affinity of maternal anti-D responsible for hemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn (HDN) and of anti-D used for the prophylaxis of that disease. A method was recently described to measure the affinity (Ka) of untagged anti-D monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs). In this work, the same method was applied to determine the Ka of polyclonal anti-D. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: O R1r red blood cells (RBCs) were sensitized with increasing concentrations of native anti-D in serum samples from immunized mothers and donors and in RhIG preparations. At equilibrium, the amount of anti-D bound to RBCs was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Scatchard and Langmuir equations were used to determine Ka. RESULTS: The experimental data fitted well with the Scatchard equation (mean r2 = 0.95) but a better correlation was observed with the Langmuir equation (mean r2 = 0.99). The mean K a of anti-D in 11 maternal serum samples, in 6 immunized donors, and in 5 lots of RhIG were 5.6 × 108 per M (from 2.8 × 108 to 12 × 108/M), 3.9 × 108 per M (from 1.5 × 108 to 6.8 × 108/M), and 3.4 × 108 per M (from 3.1 × 108 to 4.2 × 108/M), respectively. The comparison of anti-D affinity in 5 cases of HDN with fetal anemia and in 6 cases of HDN with postnatal anemia showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The method previously described for anti-D MoAbs was applied to polyclonal anti-D present in the serum of immunized subjects and in immunoglobulin preparations. The experimental data fitted well with the Langmuir equation, and the affinity of polyclonal of anti-D was measured with accuracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Debbia, M., Brossard, Y., & Lambin, P. (2005). Measurement of the affinity of anti-D in the serum of immunized mothers and in immunoglobulin preparations with unlabeled antibodies. Transfusion, 45(6), 975–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.04313.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free