Comparing Antibody Interfaces to Inform Rational Design of New Antibody Formats

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As the current biotherapeutic market is dominated by antibodies, the design of different antibody formats, like bispecific antibodies and other new formats, represent a key component in advancing antibody therapy. When designing new formats, a targeted modulation of pairing preferences is key. Several existing approaches are successful, but expanding the repertoire of design possibilities would be desirable. Cognate immunoglobulin G antibodies depend on homodimerization of the fragment crystallizable regions of two identical heavy chains. By modifying the dimeric interface of the third constant domain (CH3-CH3), with different mutations on each domain, the engineered Fc fragments form rather heterodimers than homodimers. The first constant domain (CH1-CL) shares a very similar fold and interdomain orientation with the CH3-CH3 dimer. Thus, numerous well-established design efforts for CH3-CH3 interfaces, have also been applied to CH1-CL dimers to reduce the number of mispairings in the Fabs. Given the high structural similarity of the CH3-CH3 and CH1-CL domains we want to identify additional opportunities in comparing the differences and overlapping interaction profiles. Our vision is to facilitate a toolkit that allows for the interchangeable usage of different design tools from crosslinking the knowledge between these two interface types. As a starting point, here, we use classical molecular dynamics simulations to identify differences of the CH3-CH3 and CH1-CL interfaces and already find unexpected features of these interfaces shedding new light on possible design variations. Apart from identifying clear differences between the similar CH3-CH3 and CH1-CL dimers, we structurally characterize the effects of point-mutations in the CH3-CH3 interface on the respective dynamics and interface interaction patterns. Thus, this study has broad implications in the field of antibody engineering as it provides a structural and mechanistical understanding of antibody interfaces and thereby presents a crucial aspect for the design of bispecific antibodies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández-Quintero, M. L., Quoika, P. K., Wedl, F. S., Seidler, C. A., Kroell, K. B., Loeffler, J. R., … Liedl, K. R. (2022). Comparing Antibody Interfaces to Inform Rational Design of New Antibody Formats. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.812750

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free