Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Expectations Orderings, and Conceptual Spaces

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In Gärdenfors and Makinson (Artif Intell 65(2):197–245, 1994) and Gärdenfors (Knowledge representation and reasoning under uncertainty, Springer-Verlag, 1992) it was shown that it is possible to model nonmonotonic inference using a classical consequence relation plus an expectation-based ordering of formulas. In this article, we argue that this framework can be significantly enriched by adopting a conceptual spaces-based analysis of the role of expectations in reasoning. In particular, we show that this can solve various epistemological issues that surround nonmonotonic and default logics. We propose some formal criteria for constructing and updating expectation orderings based on conceptual spaces, and we explain how to apply them to nonmonotonic reasoning about objects and properties.

References Powered by Scopus

Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases

22747Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Features of similarity

5485Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cognitive representations of semantic categories

2862Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Reasoning with Concepts: A Unifying Framework

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analogy as a search procedure: a dimensional view

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantum projections on conceptual subspaces

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Osta-Vélez, M., & Gärdenfors, P. (2022). Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Expectations Orderings, and Conceptual Spaces. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 31(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10849-021-09347-6

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

60%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 3

50%

Computer Science 1

17%

Psychology 1

17%

Linguistics 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0