Prevention, detection, and response to anthrax outbreak in Northern Tanzania using one health approach: A case study of Selela ward in Monduli district

12Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Anthrax is an infectious fatal zoonotic disease caused by Bacillus anthracis. Anthrax outbreak was confirmed in samples of wild animals following rumors of the outbreak in wild animals, livestock, and humans in Selela ward, Monduli district of Northern Tanzania. Therefore, a multi-sectoral team was deployed for outbreak response in the affected areas. Objectives: The aim of the response was to manage the outbreak in a One Health approach and specifically: (i) To determine the magnitude of anthrax outbreak in humans, livestock, and wild animals in Selela ward, (ii) to assess the outbreak local response capacity, (iii) to establish mechanisms for safe disposal of animal carcasses in the affected areas, and (iv) to mount effective control and preventive strategies using One Health approach in the affected areas. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional field survey using: (i) Active searching of suspected human cases at health facilities and community level, (ii) physical counting and disposal of wild animal carcasses in the affected area, (iii) collection of specimens from suspected human cases and animal carcasses for laboratory analysis, and (iv) meetings with local animal and human health staff, political, and traditional leaders at local levels. We analyzed data by STATA software, and a map was created using Quantum GIS software. Results: A total of 21 humans were suspected, and most of them (62%) being from Selela ward. The outbreak caused deaths of 10 cattle, 26 goats, and three sheep, and 131 wild animal carcasses were discarded the majority of them being wildebeest (83%). Based on laboratory results, three blood smears tested positive for anthrax using Giemsa staining while two wildebeest samples tested positive and five human blood samples tested negative for anthrax using quantitative polymerase chain reaction techniques. Clinical forms of anthrax were also observed in humans and livestock which suggest that wild animals may contribute as reservoir of anthrax which can easily be transmitted to humans and livestock. Conclusion: The rapid outbreak response by multi-sectoral teams using a One Health approach managed to contain the outbreak. The teams were composed of animal and human health experts from national to village levels to control the outbreak. The study testifies the importance of multi-sectoral collaboration using One Health approach in outbreak preparedness and response.

References Powered by Scopus

Anthrax and wildlife

205Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Towards a conceptual framework to support one-health research for policy on emerging zoonoses

187Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

One health contributions towards more effective and equitable approaches to health in low- and middle-income countries

125Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Ecological niche modeling as a tool for prediction of the potential geographic distribution of Bacillus anthracis spores in Tanzania

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risk factors for human cutaneous anthrax outbreaks in the hotspot districts of Northern Tanzania: An unmatchedcase-controlstudy

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meat Safety in Northern Tanzania: Inspectors' and Slaughter Workers' Risk Perceptions and Management

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mwakapeje, E. R., Assenga, J. A., Kunda, J. S., Mjingo, E. E., Makondo, Z. E., Nonga, H. E., … Skjerve, E. (2017). Prevention, detection, and response to anthrax outbreak in Northern Tanzania using one health approach: A case study of Selela ward in Monduli district. International Journal of One Health, 3, 66–76. https://doi.org/10.14202/IJOH.2017.66-76

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

68%

Researcher 9

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

6%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medic... 15

44%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 6

18%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 6

18%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free