Comparison of external R&D and internal R&D: Based on the perspective of S&T development of China’s pharmaceutical manufacturing industry

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose The science and technology (S&T) innovation in China’s pharmaceutical industry has entered a bottleneck. The choice between external and internal research and development (R&D) has become a significant challenge for S&T development. To provide scientific suggestions for companies to choose an R&D strategy and enhance S&T development, we analyzed and compared the impacts of two R&D strategies on S&T output. Methods We selected the data related to China’s pharmaceutical manufacturing industry from 2000 to 2019, established regression equations by the E-G two-step method, and used the VAR model for impulse responses and variance decompositions to research the relationship between two R&D strategies and S&T output. Results There is a stable long-term equilibrium relationship between two R&D strategies, including external and internal R&D, and S&T output in China’s pharmaceutical manufacturing industry. When internal R&D increases by 1%, S&T output increases by 0.7382% with a 5-year lag. When S&T output increases by 1%, external R&D increases by 2.0749% with a 2-year lag. Conclusion Compared with external R&D, internal R&D can boost S&T output.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, D., Wang, S., Chang, S., Lian, G., & Chen, Y. (2022). Comparison of external R&D and internal R&D: Based on the perspective of S&T development of China’s pharmaceutical manufacturing industry. PLoS ONE, 17(6 June). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270271

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free