Objective: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3.0-T breast MRI interpretation using manual and fully automated kinetic analyses. Material and methods: Manual MRI interpretation was done on an Advantage Workstation. Retrospectively, all examinations were processed with a computer-aided detection (CAD) system.CADdata sets were interpreted by two experienced breast radiologists and two residents. For each lesion automated analysis of enhancement kinetics was evaluated at 50% and 100% thresholds. Forty-nine malignant and 22 benign lesions were evaluated. Results: Using threshold enhancement alone, the sensitivity and specificity of CAD were 97.9% and 86.4%, respectively, for the 50% threshold, and 97.9% and 90%, respectively, for the 100% threshold. Manual interpretation by two breast radiologists showed a sensitivity of 84.6% and a specificity of 68.8%. For the same two radiologists the mean sensitivity and specificity for CAD-based interpretation was 90.4% (not significant) and 81.3% (significant at p<0.05), respectively.With one-way ANOVA no significant differences were found between the two breast radiologists and the two residents together, or between any two readers separately. Conclusion: CAD-based analysis improved the specificity compared with manual analysis of enhancement. Automated analysis at 50% and 100% thresholds showed a high sensitivity and specificity for readers with varying levels of experience. © The Author(s) 2009.
CITATION STYLE
Meeuwis, C., Van De Ven, S. M., Stapper, G., Fernandez Gallardo, A. M., Van Den Bosch, M. A. A. J., Mali, W. P. T. M., & Veldhuis, W. B. (2010). Computer-aided detection (CAD) for breast MRI: Evaluation of efficacy at 3.0 T. European Radiology, 20(3), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1573-5
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.