A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution

60Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Confusion matrices were obtained for visual letter recognition and for tactual letter recognition with (1) the finger held stationary on small raised letters and (2) the finger allowed to scan them. In each sensory mode, performance was investigated at four letter sizes, with heights ranging from 1.5 to 3.0 min of arc for vision and from 3.0 to 8.0 mm for touch. The two tactual modes yielded similar recognition performance, although performance was always better in the scanned mode. For both vision and touch, performance appeared to be limited by primary receptor spacing. Letter heights corresponding to 50% correct identification (vision, 2.2 rain arc; scanned touch, 4 ram; static touch, 5 ram) spanned about five receptor spacings in each sensory system, indicating that the dimensional equivalence of vision and touch is determined by receptor spacing rather than central factors. The patterns of letter confusions and the productmoment correlations for correct identifications (vision vs. static touch, 0.83; vision vs. scanned touch, 0.75; and static touch vs. scanned touch, 0.89, all taken at comparable performance levels) imply that similar spatial processes are involved in the different modes. © 1983 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Phillips, J. R., Johnson, K. O., & Browne, H. M. (1983). A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(3), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202952

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free