Comparison of visual acuity outcomes in predominantly classic vs occult lesions in age-related macular degeneration treated with photodynamic therapy

11Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine if patients with occult with no classic and predominantly classic (PC) choroidal neovascular membranes have clinically equivalent visual outcomes after treatment with photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study. Two hundred and seventy-seven consecutive patients with occult or PC choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration treated with PDT were included. The main outcome was the difference in mean change in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) acuity lost from baseline in occult vsPC lesions, with the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) set at 7.5 letters. Results: At baseline, 131 patients had occult and 146 had PC choroidal neovascularization. Twelve-month follow-up data were available for 94 occult and 110 PC participants. Occult patients lost an average of 8.7 letters (1.9 lines), and patients in the PC group an average of 10.0 ETDRS letters (two lines) over 12 months. The mean letters lost at 12 months was not significantly different between the groups, and the MCID was not detected (difference = 1.3 letters; P=0.411; 95% confidence interval (-2.3, 5.6)). Patients with occult lesions required a mean of 2.99 treatments vsa mean of 2.96 treatments in the PC group (out of a possible 4; P=0.172). Conclusion: We were not able to detect a clinically important difference in mean change in visual acuity with PDT treatment between patients with occult and PC lesions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Potter, M. J., Szabo, S. M., & Li, W. W. (2008). Comparison of visual acuity outcomes in predominantly classic vs occult lesions in age-related macular degeneration treated with photodynamic therapy. Eye, 22(2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702547

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free