European Public Prosecutor's Office-A view on the state of play and perspectives from the European Parliament

2Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

During the discussions on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office ('EPPO'), the European Parliament had to make the best out of a role in which procedurally it could ultimately only say yes or no to the outcome of the negotiations between the Member States. It has done so by adopting a number of Interim Resolutions with Recommendations to the Council. In preparing its positions Parliament benefited from an in house Appraisal of the Impact Assessment accompanying the Commission Proposal. Parliament has insisted on the establishment of an effective EPPO which respects fundamental rights. Such an EPPO should also be efficient from a resources perspective creating the right synergies with Eurojust and OLAF, which will continue to play an important role in the fight against fraud, particularly now that the EPPO will be established under enhanced cooperation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Ballegooij, W. (2017). European Public Prosecutor’s Office-A view on the state of play and perspectives from the European Parliament. In Shifting Perspectives on the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (pp. 27–38). T.M.C. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-216-3_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free