Use of simulation-based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis

111Citations
Citations of this article
178Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: Central venous catheterization (CVC) is increasingly taught by simulation. The authors reviewed the literature on the effects of simulation training in CVC on learner and clinical outcomes. Method: The authors searched computerized databases (1950 to May 2010), reference lists, and considered studies with a control group (without simulation education intervention). Two independent assessors reviewed the retrieved citations. Independent data abstraction was performed on study design, study quality score, learner characteristics, sample size, components of interventional curriculum, outcomes assessed, and method of assessment. Learner outcomes included performance measures on simulators, knowledge, and confidence. Patient outcomes included number of needle passes, arterial puncture, pneumothorax, and catheter-related infections. Results: Twenty studies were identified. Simulation-based education was associated with significant improvements in learner outcomes: performance on simulators (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.60 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.76]), knowledge (SMD 0.60 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.84]), and confidence (SMD 0.41 [95% CI 0.30 to 0.53] for studies with single-group pretest and posttest design; SMD 0.52 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.81) for studies with nonrandomized, two-group design). Furthermore, simulation-based education was associated with improved patient outcomes, including fewer needle passes (SMD -0.58 [95% CI -0.95 to -0.20]), and pneumothorax (relative risk 0.62 [95% CI 0.40 to 0.97]), for studies with nonrandomized, two-group design. However, simulation-based training was not associated with a significant reduction in risk of either arterial puncture or catheter-related infections. Conclusions: Despite some limitations in the literature reviewed, evidence suggests that simulation-based education for CVC provides benefits in learner and select clinical outcomes. © 2011 Association of American Medical Colleges.

References Powered by Scopus

Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

49419Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Meta-analysis in clinical trials

33018Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

22844Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition

661Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods: The Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale-Education

563Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strategies to prevent central line-associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update

446Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, I. W. Y., Brindle, M. E., Ronksley, P. E., Lorenzetti, D. L., Sauve, R. S., & Ghali, W. A. (2011). Use of simulation-based education to improve outcomes of central venous catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Medicine. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318226a204

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 59

52%

Researcher 25

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 23

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 89

78%

Social Sciences 11

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

7%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free