Performance management and evaluation meets culture and politics: Australia’s experience

4Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An underlying tension exists between the fundamental elements of accountability, government decision-making, performance management, evidence-based policy and the measurement of results. This article considers this through three lenses: evaluation of government policies and programs; program structures and performance indicators; and the challenges of big data. While use of new technologies and big data opens up opportunities for strengthened evidence-based policy, this does not address the tension between a disciplined results-based approach to government decision-making and the inherently political nature of these decisions. There remain also important challenges to the effective development and use of big data in government.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bray, J. R., Gray, M. C., & Stanton, D. I. (2020). Performance management and evaluation meets culture and politics: Australia’s experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2020.1808491

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free