Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery—Comparison of angle based procedures

Abstract

Surgical procedures are playing an increasing role in the care of patients with glaucoma. Within the last decade, new surgical procedures have been established, which are summarized under the term minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). A wide variety of different procedures are aimed at the structures in the angle of the anterior chamber, such as the trabecular meshwork and Schlemm’s canal, to improve the physiological outflow or to improve the alternative uveoscleral outflow. The implementation of the treatment goal differs in the individual procedures, as does the maximum pressure reduction that can be achieved. Compared to trabeculectomy with the use of cytostatic agents, the achievable pressure reduction is usually significantly lower. In contrast, the significantly lower intraoperative and postoperative complication rates are emphasized as an advantage of these procedures. With increasing clinical experience and the growth of sufficient data on these new surgical procedures, a well-founded classification in the treatment algorithm of glaucoma surgery becomes easier; nevertheless, due to the small differences with respect to efficacy and safety profile, the final decision for an individual procedure often remains dependent on the surgeon’s personal preferences.