Healthcare system inputs and patient-reported outcomes: A study in adults with congenital heart defect from 15 countries

5Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The relationship between healthcare system inputs (e.g., human resources and infrastructure) and mortality has been extensively studied. However, the association between healthcare system inputs and patient-reported outcomes remains unclear. Hence, we explored the predictive value of human resources and infrastructures of the countries' healthcare system on patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 3588 patients with congenital heart disease (median age = 31y; IQR = 16.0; 52% women; 26% simple, 49% moderate, and 25% complex defects) from 15 countries. The following patient-reported outcomes were measured: Perceived physical and mental health, psychological distress, health behaviors, and quality of life. The assessed inputs of the healthcare system were: (i) human resources (i.e., density of physicians and nurses, both per 1000 people) and (ii) infrastructure (i.e., density of hospital beds per 10,000 people). Univariable, multivariable, and sensitivity analyses using general linear mixed models were conducted, adjusting for patient-specific variables and unmeasured country differences. Results: Sensitivity analyses showed that higher density of physicians was significantly associated with better self-reported physical and mental health, less psychological distress, and better quality of life. A greater number of nurses was significantly associated with better self-reported physical health, less psychological distress, and less risky health behavior. No associations between a higher density of hospital beds and patient-reported outcomes were observed. Conclusions: This explorative study suggests that density of human resources for health, measured on country level, are associated with patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease. More research needs to be conducted before firm conclusions about the relationships observed can be drawn. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150603. Registered 30 May 2014,

References Powered by Scopus

World Medical Association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects

0
19965Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2521Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Congenital heart disease in 56,109 births. Incidence and natural history.

1051Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Mental health in adult congenital heart disease

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-reported outcomes in adults with congenital heart disease: What have we learned from APPROACH-IS?

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Following Hospitalization (from APPROACH-IS)

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Bulck, L., Goossens, E., Luyckx, K., Apers, S., Oechslin, E., Thomet, C., … Moons, P. (2020). Healthcare system inputs and patient-reported outcomes: A study in adults with congenital heart defect from 15 countries. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05361-9

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

62%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Researcher 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 11

48%

Medicine and Dentistry 8

35%

Social Sciences 2

9%

Psychology 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0