Evidence for early top-down modulation of attention to salient visual cues through probe detection

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The influence of top-down attentional control on the selection of salient visual stimuli has been examined extensively. Some accounts suggest all salient stimuli capture attention in a stimulus-driven manner, while others suggest salient stimuli capture attention contingent on top-down relevance. Evidence consistently shows target templates allow only salient stimuli sharing a target’s features to capture attention, while salient stimuli not sharing a target’s features do not. A number of hypotheses (e.g., contingent orienting, disengagement, signal suppression) from both sides of this debate have been proposed; however, most predict similar performance in the visual search and spatial cuing tasks. The present study combined a cuing task, in which subjects identified a target defined by its having a unique feature, with a probe identification task developed by Gaspelin, Leonard, and Luck (Psychological Science, 26, 1740-1750, 2015), in which subjects identified letters appearing in potential target locations just after the appearance of a salient cue that matched or did not match the target-defining feature. The probe task provided a measure of where attention was focused just after the cue’s appearance. In six experiments, we observed top-down modulation of spatial cuing effects in response times and probe identification: Probes in the cued location were identified more often, but more when preceded by a cue that shared the target-defining feature. Though not unequivocal, the results are explained in terms of the on-going debate over whether top-down attentional control can prevent bottom-up capture by salient, task-irrelevant stimuli.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burnham, B. R. (2020). Evidence for early top-down modulation of attention to salient visual cues through probe detection. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 82(3), 1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01850-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free