Safety and efficacy of a prescription digital therapeutic as an adjunct to buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder

27Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a digital therapeutic in treatment-seeking individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) in an analysis of randomized clinical trial (RCT) data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00929253). Methods: Secondary analysis of an RCT including 170 adults meeting DSM-IV criteria for OUD. Participants were randomized to 12-weeks of treatment-as-usual (TAU) or TAU plus a digital therapeutic providing 67 digital, interactive educational modules based on the Community Reinforcement Approach. TAU consisted of buprenorphine maintenance therapy, 30 min biweekly clinician interaction, and abstinence-based contingency management. Primary endpoints were treatment retention and abstinence (negative urine drug screen) during weeks 9–12 of treatment. Safety was assessed by evaluating adverse events. Results: Participants randomized to TAU plus a digital therapeutic had significantly greater odds of opioid abstinence during weeks 9–12 compared to TAU: 77.3 versus 62.1%, respectively (p=.02), OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.10–3.95. The risk of patients leaving treatment was significantly lower in the digital therapeutic group (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.26–0.92). No significant difference was observed in the rate of adverse events between groups (p=.42). Conclusions: A prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) in combination with buprenorphine therapy improves clinically significant patient outcomes including abstinence from illicit opioids and retention in treatment compared with treatment as usual.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maricich, Y. A., Bickel, W. K., Marsch, L. A., Gatchalian, K., Botbyl, J., & Luderer, H. F. (2021). Safety and efficacy of a prescription digital therapeutic as an adjunct to buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 37(2), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1846022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free