A comparison among different kinds of stator lamination in tubular linear machines

11Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper the authors perform a comparison among three different stator structures for a Tubular Permanent Magnet Linear Machine. Each structure is characterized by its own lamination which is expected to contribute to the overall performance of the machine. A detailed analysis of the main figures of merit of the three configurations has been carried out in order to identify the configuration with the best characteristics. Significant data such as flux distribution, rated voltage and current, force on the moved and power losses have been compared. The results show that the choice of a mixed stator lamination allows to improve the performance of these machines.

References Powered by Scopus

Wave energy utilization: A review of the technologies

2460Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A general framework for the analysis and design of tubular linear permanent magnet machines

400Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review on electrical control strategies for wave energy converting systems

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Linear Electric Machine Design for an Off-Highway Vehicle Hydraulic Charge Pump

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Numerical simulation of wave energy production through experimental tool

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Design of a dual halbach array tubular linear motor for long stroke and large force

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cipriani, G., Corpora, M., Di Dio, V., Musolino, A., Rizzo, R., & Sani, L. (2016). A comparison among different kinds of stator lamination in tubular linear machines. Progress In Electromagnetics Research M, 50, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.2528/PIERM16071201

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

50%

Researcher 3

38%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 7

88%

Energy 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free