Self-regulation for reading comprehension: Psychometric properties of two motivation scales

1Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Personal achievement goals and self-efficacy make up the motivational dimension of self-regulated learning. This research investigates the initial psychometric properties of the Achievement Goals Scale for Reading Comprehension and the Self-efficacy Scale for Reading Comprehension. The evidence-based test content validity study involved three expert judges and 16 Middle School, who pointed to the theoretical and practical adequacy of the scales. Validity evidence based on the scales' internal structure was obtained with a sample of 522 students, using factor analysis as statistical resources. We verified the plausibility of the three-factor Achievement Goals Scale model and the one-factor Self-efficacy Scale model, and identified reasonable reliability estimates. Results indicate that the scales can be used in exploratory investigations. We suggest further research to expand its psychometric quality.

References Powered by Scopus

Coefficient kappa: Some uses, misuses, and alternatives

1075Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Has achievement goal theory been right? A meta-analysis of the relation between goal structures and personal achievement goals

174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers

99Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Psychometric Properties of the Causal Attributions Scale for Reading Comprehension

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferraz, A. S., & Dos Santos, A. A. A. (2021). Self-regulation for reading comprehension: Psychometric properties of two motivation scales. Paideia, 31. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3135

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

20%

Researcher 2

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

38%

Psychology 2

25%

Medicine and Dentistry 2

25%

Chemical Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free