Pelvic reduction during pyeloplasty for antenatal hydronephrosis: Does it affect outcome in ultrasound and nuclear scan postoperatively?

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To compare ultrasound (US) scan and nuclear renography findings in patients who underwent pyeloplasty with and without pelvic reduction in a randomized prospective study. Methods: A total of 42 patients, all prenatally diagnosed with unilateral hydronephrosis, were included. Hydronephrosis was confirmed postnatally. Twenty patients were randomly selected to undergo pyeloplasty with pelvic reduction and 22 underwent pelvis-sparing pyeloplasty. Patients were evaluated with mercaptoacetyltriglycine-3 scans on the sixth month and US scans on the first, third, and sixth months, postoperatively. Mean follow-up was 37 +/- 5.6 weeks. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square test and significance was set as P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burgu, B., Suer, E., Aydogdu, O., & Soygur, T. (2010, December). Pelvic reduction during pyeloplasty for antenatal hydronephrosis: Does it affect outcome in ultrasound and nuclear scan postoperatively? International Braz J Urol. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382010000600030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free