Hope, Optimism, and Clinical Pain: A Meta-Analysis

27Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Generalized expectancies have been theorized to play key roles in pain-related outcomes, but the empirical findings have been mixed. Purpose: The primary aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify the relationships between two of the most researched positive generalized expectancies (i.e., hope and optimism) and pain-related outcomes (i.e., pain severity, physical functioning, and psychological dysfunction) for those experiencing clinical pain. Methods: A total of 96 studies and 31,780 participants with a broad array of pain diagnoses were included in analyses, using random-effects models. Results: Both hope and optimism had negative correlations with pain severity (hope: r = -.168, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shanahan, M. L., Fischer, I. C., Hirsh, A. T., Stewart, J. C., & Rand, K. L. (2019, September 1). Hope, Optimism, and Clinical Pain: A Meta-Analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free