A Comparison of Three Designs for List-style Open-ended Questions in Web Surveys

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although list-style open-ended questions generally help us gain deeper insights into respondents’ thoughts, opinions, and behaviors, the quality of responses is often compromised. We tested a dynamic and a follow-up design to motivate respondents to give higher quality responses than with a static design, but without overburdening them. Our results showed that a follow-up design achieved longer responses with more themes and theme areas than a static design. In contrast, the dynamic design produced the shortest answers with the fewest themes and theme areas. No differences in item nonresponse and only minor differences in additional response burden were found among the three list-style designs. Our study shows that design features and timing are crucial to clarify the desired response format and motivate respondents to give high-quality answers to list-style open-ended questions.

References Powered by Scopus

Computing response metrics for online panels

407Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Open-ended questions in web surveys

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The influence of topic interest and interactive probing on responses to open-ended questions in Web surveys

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kunz, T., & Meitinger, K. (2022). A Comparison of Three Designs for List-style Open-ended Questions in Web Surveys. Field Methods, 34(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221115831

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

67%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0