Why Compensating the ‘Stayers’ for the Costs of Mobility Is the Wrong Way to Go

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Like most of the previous respondents, I agree with Ferrera that the unequal division of the costs and benefits of free movement calls for action. My main criticism concerns his proposal to compensate non-mobile citizens. In my response, I shall expand on Christian Joppke’s critique of Ferrera’s presumption that ‘moving’ causes harm that ‘stayers’ should be indemnified for. I argue als that there is a real possibility that in its current form the EU cannot achieved the required social union. This would mean that due to the internal constitution of the EU, EU citizenship couldn’t fulfill its integrative functions. Given the enormous problems the EU is facing, we have to take this possibility very seriously.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hermann, J. (2019). Why Compensating the ‘Stayers’ for the Costs of Mobility Is the Wrong Way to Go. In IMISCOE Research Series (pp. 235–238). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3_41

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free