Tromboembolismo pulmonar: Estratificación de riesgo y dilemas terapéuticos

1Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The prognosis of pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) is related to the cardiopulmonary reserve of the patient and the magnitude of the embolus that impacts pulmonary circulation. The presence of hemodynamic instability (shock) stratifies a group of patients with high mortality, which should be treated with thrombolysis. Patients without shock but with right ventricular dysfunction can have a dismal evolution and should be managed aggressively. CAT scan, echocardiography and serum markers can be of value to define patients with a higher mortality. The available evidence to define the best diagnostic and therapeutic strategy is scanty, controversial and inconclusive. A good combination of clinical, imaging and biological markers should be defined to identify those patients without shock but with a high rate of complications and mortality, that could benefit from aggressive treatments.

References Powered by Scopus

Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: A scientific statement from the american heart association

1867Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism

1055Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

B-type natriuretic peptide in cardiovascular disease

948Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pertinence of D-dimer request in patients in emergency services

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aizman, A., Mercado, M., & Andresen, M. (2012). Tromboembolismo pulmonar: Estratificación de riesgo y dilemas terapéuticos. Revista Medica de Chile, 140(11), 1482–1489. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872012001100016

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

78%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Researcher 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 24

83%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

10%

Sports and Recreations 1

3%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free