Comorbidity as prognostic variable in MDS: Comparative evaluation of the HCT-CI and CCI in a core dataset of 419 patients of the Austrian MDS study group

100Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The evaluation of comorbidity is of increasing importance in patients with hematologic disorders. Patients and methods: In the present study, the influence of comorbidity on survival and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) evolution was analyzed retrospectively in 419 patients with de novo myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (observation period: 1985-2007). The median age was 71 years (range 24-91 years). Two different scoring systems, the hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were applied. Results: The HCT-CI was found to be a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (OS, P < 0.05) as well as event-free survival (EFS, P < 0.05) in our patients, whereas the CCI was of prognostic significance for OS (P < 0.05), but not for EFS. For AML-free survival, neither the HCT-CI nor the CCI were of predictive value. A multivariate analysis including age, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, karyotype, number of cytopenias, French-American-British groups, and comorbidity was applied. Comorbidity was found to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with low- or int-1-risk MDS (P < 0.05) regarding OS and EFS. Conclusions: Together, our data show that comorbidity is an important risk factor for OS and EFS in patients with MDS. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sperr, W. R., Wimazal, F., Kundi, M., Baumgartner, C., Nösslinger, T., Makrai, A., … Valent, P. (2009). Comorbidity as prognostic variable in MDS: Comparative evaluation of the HCT-CI and CCI in a core dataset of 419 patients of the Austrian MDS study group. Annals of Oncology, 21(1), 114–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free